Supplemental Videos
The main topics of this section are also presented in the following videos:
The main topics of this section are also presented in the following videos:
In the previous section we discussed the result of multiplying the output of the function by a constant value. However, what happens when we multiply the input of the function? To explore this idea, we look at the graphs of
and discuss how they are related.
As we can see above, compared to the graph of the graph of is compressed horizontally by a factor of Effectively, if we are given a point on the graph of then is a point on the graph of
Looking at the table above we can verify this for a few points. For example, the point is on the graph of Then
is a point on the graph
The graph of is stretched horizontally by a factor of compared to the graph of Further, if is a point on the graph of then is a point on the graph of
We can see this playing out in our example above. Notice that is a point on and
is a point on the graph of as shown in the table and graph above. In general we have:
Compared with the graph of the graph of where is
As you may have notice by now through our examples, a horizontal stretch or compression will never change the intercepts. This is a good way to tell if such a transformation has occurred.
The graph of is shown along with either a horizontal stretch of compression of Decide if is a stretch or a compression, and give a formula for in terms of
First, notice that the \(y\)-intercept stays fixed while the \(x\)-intercepts shift closer to the \(y\)-axis. This tells us that \(g(x)\) is a horizontal compression. The \(x \)-intercepts of \(f(x)\) are \(x=-1,1,2 \) while the \(x\)-intercepts of \(g(x)\) are \(x=-.5,.5,1\text{.}\)
So, the \(x\)-intercepts of \(g(x) \) can be achieved by taking the intercepts of \(f(x) \) and divide each by 2. This tells us that \(g(x)\) is a horizontal compression by a factor of \(2 \text{.}\) Hence, we may write