Supplemental Videos
The main topics of this section are also presented in the following videos:
The main topics of this section are also presented in the following videos:
With the aid of logarithms, we can now gather more information from exponential functions. In this section we will discuss how to do this using various real world examples.
Recall that the annual growth rate is the value \(b-1\) in the exponential equation
If we want to find the continuous growth rate which is equivalent to the annual growth rate above, we first rewrite the function: \begin{align*} A(t)\amp =a(b)^t\\ \amp =a(e^r)^t. \end{align*}
Next we simply need to find the value of \(r \) which keeps the above equation true. To solve for \(r \) we apply the properties of the logarithm as discussed in the previous section. Let's take a look at a specific example of this process.
Let \(A(t)=10(.75)^t\text{.}\) Write \(A(t)\) in the form \(A(t)=ae^{rt}\) and state the continuous rate equivalent to the annual decay rate of \(25\% \text{.}\)
We want to find values \(a,r \) such that
for all values \(t \text{.}\) Rewriting the right hand side we get
which now is in the form \(a(b)^t \text{.}\) Since we want
we must have \(a=10 \text{,}\) and \(e^r=.75 \text{.}\) To find the appropriate value of \(r \) we just need to solve the equation \(e^r=.75 \) for \(r \text{.}\) Applying natural log to each side we get \begin{align*} e^r \amp = .75\\ \ln(e^r)\amp = \ln(.75)\\ r\amp =\ln(.75) \end{align*} where this last equality follows due to Property \(4 \) in the previous section. So, we can rewrite \(A(t)\) as
Furthermore, since \(\ln(.75)\approx -.2876 \text{.}\) Then a continuous decay rate of about \(28.76\%\) is equivalent to an annual decay rate of \(25\%\text{.}\)
Notice that in this previous example it was not necessary for us to use the natural logarithm. In fact, you could use a logarithm with any base you desire and still get a solution. However, since natural log has base \(e \) it is the inverse of the exponential \(e^t \) thus giving us some cancelations and hence a nicer looking solution.
Another important piece of information we can now gather from exponentials is how to identify which input value corresponds to a given output value.
Suppose we are given the function
which represents the value in dollars of an investment after \(t \) years. Identify the year in which the investment would reach $40.
We start by setting the function equal to 40:
Now, we divide each side by \(10 \) and apply a logarithm to each side. \begin{align*} 40\amp = 10(1.75)^t\\ 4\amp = (1.75)^t\\ \log(4)\amp = \log (1.75)^t\\ \log(4)\amp = t\cdot \log(1.75) \end{align*} Now, we simply divide each side by \(\log(1.75)\) to get
In the solution for the last example, it is important that we first divided each side by the coefficient of the exponential (in this last example this coefficient was \(10 \)) before applying the logarithm. If we didn't do this then, more often than not, we will make a calculation mistake.
This is due to the behavior of logarithms with multiplication. In particular,
Often this property of logarithms is forgotten, and thus leads to mistakes. Even if we remember to apply this property, this leads to much more work than is necessary.
There are a few particular input values which are solved for quite frequently. In fact, they are used often enough to have their own name.
The Doubling Time is the amount of time it takes for a quantity to double in value or size. If we are finding the doubling time of the exponential function
where \(1\lt b \text{,}\) then we are solving the equation
for \(t \text{.}\)
The Half Life is the amount of time it takes for a quantity to shrink to half its value or size. If we are finding the half life of the exponential function
where \(b\lt 1 \text{,}\) then we are solving the equation
for \(t \text{.}\)
Notice that the requirement for \(b \) to be greater than \(1 \) in doubling time and less than \(1 \) in half life is simply to have the statement make sense. For instance, we can only solve for the time it takes for an investment to double if the investment is increasing in value, and it is only increasing in value when \(1\lt b \text{.}\)
Another important thing to notice in these definitions is that we could solve for the doubling time or half life without knowing the value of the principal (or initial) value \(a \text{,}\) we need only know the rate or growth factor. For example, in the formula for doubling time we are solving for the value of \(t \) in the formula
If we were to divide each side by \(a \) we would achieve the formula
Solving this equation for \(t \) is the same as solving the original equation for \(t \) and yet this new equation does not involve \(a \) at all.