Nathan Wakefield, Christine Kelley, Marla Williams, Michelle Haver, Lawrence Seminario-Romero, Robert Huben, Aurora Marks, Stephanie Prahl, Based upon Active Calculus by Matthew Boelkins
In Section 7.3, we encountered more infinite series and began discussing how to test for convergence or divergence using the th term and integral tests. But what can we do when presented with series that are similar to simpler series that we know converge or diverge, such as -series, but that we are unable to apply a different test to? In this section, we will consider two tests which involve comparing the convergence or divergence of two series -- the direct comparison test and the limit comparison test.
The Integral Test in the previous section allows us to determine the convergence of an entire family of series: the -series. However, we have seen that it is often difficult to integrate functions, so the Integral Test is not one that we can use all of the time. In fact, even for a relatively simple series such as , the Integral Test is not an option. In what follows we develop a test that applies to series of rational functions by comparing their behavior to that of other series whose convergence behavior we know.
The idea behind the Direct Comparison Test is very intuitive. If a series has terms that are all (beyond a certain ) smaller than the corresponding terms in a series that we know converges, then the unknown series must also converge, because it is "smaller" than something finite. Thus, we can use the first bullet point above to prove that a series converges.
On the other hand, if a series has terms that are all (beyond a certain ) larger than the corresponding terms in a series that we know diverges, then the series must also diverge, because it is "larger" than something infinite. Thus, we can use the second bullet point to prove that a series diverges.
Example7.28.
Consider the series
Since the convergence or divergence of a series only depends on the behavior of the series for large values of , we might examine the terms of this series more closely as gets large. By computing the value of for and , explain why the terms are essentially when is large.
This gives us the sense that the series should behave the same way that behaves. Does converge or diverge? Why?
Show that for all , You can then use the direct comparison test to argue that
converges.
Use a similar method to the parts above to determine whether
converges or diverges.
Solution.
When is very large, the constant 2 in the numerator is negligible when compared to , and the constant 1 in the denominator is negligible when compared to . So for large , the numerator looks like and the denominator looks like . Thus, the fraction looks like for large .
We know that is a -series with , so it is a convergent series. Thus, we expect that will converge too.
Since we expect to converge, we’ll want to use the first bullet point from the test, so we need to complete the inequality
until we get to a series we know converges. Since a fraction increases if we make the numerator larger or if we make the denominator smaller, we can do the following:
for all . Now since converges, then also converges by the Direct Comparison Test.
We similarly first get a feel for what we expect the series to do. For very large , behaves like . Since diverges, then also diverges, so we expect to diverge as well.
Thus, this time we’ll use the second bullet point and build the inequality
where the middle is filled in with a series whose convergence behavior we know. To make a fraction smaller, we should decrease the numerator and increase the denominator. So we can do
Now since diverges, then also diverges by the Direct Comparison Test.
In order to use the direct comparison test, we have to be able to set up the inequalities requried by the test, which can sometimes be difficult. The following example illustrates this.
Example7.29.
Consider the series .
For large , what -series does behave like? Using this, do you expect to converge or diverge?
Set up an inequality to apply the direct comparison test to prove that the series converges or diverges. What makes this challenging?
Solution.
For large , behaves like . Since is a -series with , then converges, so we expect to converge as well.
We need to find a series whose th term is larger than . We can begin as in the previous example with:
for all . However, is smaller than , not larger. Thus, we have to make more of an effort to find a useful inequality. For example:
.
This works because in the numerator, for . Now , which yields a convergent -series. Therefore, by the direct comparison test, also converges.
The limit comparison test is another test that can be used to determine series convergence and works in many of the same situations that the direct comparison test is used. However, the limit comparison test does not require any inequalities between the series you are comparing, so in some cases it can be easier to use than the direct comparison test.
Example7.30.
Once again, consider the series .
Recall that for large , looks like . Let’s formalize this observation a bit more. Let and . Calculate
.
What does the value of the limit tell you about and for large values of ? Compare your response from part (a).
What do you think that this tells us about the convergence or divergence of the series , based on the convergence of ? Explain.
Answer.
so for large values of .
converges.
Solution.
Note that
.
This tells us that for large values of , formally (before, we were only building intuition and hadn’t proved this).
Since , the series is a -series with and so converges. Since for large values of , it seems reasonable to expect that . Since is finite, we should then conclude that is also finite. So should be a convergent series.
Example 7.30 illustrates how we can compare one series with positive terms to another whose convergence status we know. Suppose we have two series and with positive terms and we know the convergence status of the series . Recall that the convergence or divergence of a series depends only on the terms of the series for large values of , so if we know that and are proportional for large , then the two series and should behave the same way. In other words, if there is a positive finite constant such that
Since multiplying by a nonzero constant does not affect the convergence or divergence of a series, it follows that the series and either both converge or both diverge. The formal statement of this fact is called the Limit Comparison Test.
The Limit Comparison Test shows that if we have a series of rational functions where is a polynomial of degree and a polynomial of degree , then the series will behave like the series . So this test allows us to determine the convergence or divergence of series whose terms are rational functions.
Example7.31.
Use the Limit Comparison Test to determine the convergence or divergence of the series
.
by comparing it to the series .
Answer.
converges.
Solution.
Let and . Then
.
Since is a finite positive constant, the Limit Comparison Test shows that and either both converge or both diverge. We know that is a -series with and so converges. Therefore, the series also converges.
Applying the integral test can be difficult due to the difficulty of integration. We can in many cases instead use the direct comparison test to compare the convergence of a challenging series with a much simpler -series. In particular, if for all , then
If converges, then also converges.
If diverges, then also diverges.
The limit comparison test applies in many of the same situations as the comparison test, but does not require showing any inequality relationship between the two series. If for some positive (finite) constant , then and either both converge or both diverge.
We know that the series is a -series with and so converges. In this part of the exercise we will see how to use information about to determine information about . Let and .
Let be the th partial sum of and the th partial sum of . Which is larger, or ? Why?
Recall that
and .
Which is larger, or ? Based on that answer, which is larger, or ?
Recall that
and .
Which is larger, or ? Based on that answer, which is larger, or ?
Which is larger, or ? Explain. Based on that answer, which is larger, or ?
Based on your response to the previous part of this exercise, what relationship do you expect there to be between and ? Do you expect to converge or diverge? Why?