Recall that for a single-variable function , the second derivative of is defined to be the derivative of the first derivative. That is, , which can be stated in terms of the limit definition of the derivative by writing
In what follows, we begin exploring the four different second-order partial derivatives of a function of two variables and seek to understand what these various derivatives tell us about the function’s behavior.
Once again, let’s consider the function defined by that measures a projectile’s range as a function of its initial speed and launch angle . The graph of this function, including traces with and , is shown in Figure 2.2.1.
Figure2.2.1.The distance function with traces and .
Compute the partial derivative . Notice that itself is a new function of and , so we may now compute the partial derivatives of . Find the partial derivative and show that .
Figure 2.2.2 shows the trace of with with three tangent lines included. Explain how your result from part (a) of this preview activity is reflected in this figure.
Figure2.2.2.The trace with .
Determine the partial derivative , and then find the partial derivative . Evaluate .
Figure2.2.3.More traces of the range function.
Figure 2.2.3 shows the trace and includes three tangent lines. Explain how the value of is reflected in this figure.
Because and are each functions of both and , they each have two partial derivatives. Not only can we compute , but also ; likewise, in addition to , but also . For the range function , use your earlier computations of and to now determine and . Write one sentence to explain how you calculated these “mixed” partial derivatives.
A function of two independent variables and has two first order partial derivatives, and . As we saw in Preview Activity 2.2.1, each of these first-order partial derivatives has two partial derivatives, giving a total of four second-order partial derivatives:
means that we first differentiate with respect to and then with respect to ; this can be expressed in the alternate notation . However, to find the second partial derivative
Be sure to note carefully the difference between Leibniz notation and subscript notation and the order in which and appear in each. In addition, remember that anytime we compute a partial derivative, we hold constant the variable(s) other than the one we are differentiating with respect to.
Find all second order partial derivatives of the following functions. For each partial derivative you calculate, state explicitly which variable is being held constant.
How many second order partial derivatives does the function defined by have? Find and (you do not need to find the other second order partial derivatives).
Solution.
There are two-letter ’words’ made from the letters ,, and :
But we know from Clairaut’s Theorem that ,, and . So there are 6 different second-order partial derivatives. Here are the ones we are asked to compute:
In Preview Activity 2.2.1 and Activity 2.2.4, you may have noticed that the mixed second-order partial derivatives are equal. This observation holds generally and is known as Clairaut’s Theorem.
Recall from single variable calculus that the second derivative measures the instantaneous rate of change of the derivative. This observation is the key to understanding the meaning of the second-order partial derivatives.
Furthermore, we remember that the second derivative of a function at a point provides us with information about the concavity of the function at that point. Since the unmixed second-order partial derivative requires us to hold constant and differentiate twice with respect to , we may simply view as the second derivative of a trace of where is fixed. As such, will measure the concavity of this trace.
Consider, for example, .Figure 2.2.5 shows the graph of this function along with the trace given by . Also shown are three tangent lines to this trace, with increasing -values from left to right among the three plots in Figure 2.2.5.
That the slope of the tangent line is decreasing as increases is reflected, as it is in one-variable calculus, in the fact that the trace is concave down. Indeed, we see that and so , since for all values of , including .
In Figure 2.2.6, we see the trace of that has held constant with . We also see three different lines that are tangent to the trace of in the direction at values of that are increasing from left to right in the figure. Write a couple of sentences that describe whether the slope of the tangent lines to this curve increase or decrease as increases, and, after computing , explain how this observation is related to the value of . Be sure to address the notion of concavity in your response.(You need to be careful about the directions in which and are increasing.)
Figure2.2.6.The tangent lines to a trace with increasing .
In Figure 2.2.7, we start to think about the mixed partial derivative, . Here, we first hold constant to generate the first-order partial derivative , and then we hold constant to compute . This leads to first thinking about a trace with being constant, followed by slopes of tangent lines in the -direction that slide along the original trace. You might think of sliding your pencil down the trace with constant in a way that its slope indicates in order to further animate the three snapshots shown in the figure.
Figure2.2.7.The trace of with , along with tangent lines in the -direction at three different points.
Based on Figure 2.2.7, is positive or negative? Why?
Determine the formula for , and hence evaluate . How does this value compare with your observations in (b)?
We know that measures the concavity of the trace, and that measures the concavity of the trace. What do you think the quantity measures?
On Figure 2.2.7, sketch the trace with , and sketch three tangent lines whose slopes correspond to the value of for three different values of , the middle of which is . Is positive or negative? Why? What does measure?
Just as with the first-order partial derivatives, we can approximate second-order partial derivatives in the situation where we have only partial information about the function.
As we saw in Activity 2.1.5, the wind chill , in degrees Fahrenheit, is a function of the wind speed, in miles per hour, and the air temperature, in degrees Fahrenheit. Some values of the wind chill are recorded in Table 2.2.8.
Table2.2.8.Wind chill as a function of wind speed and temperature.
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
5
-46
-40
-34
-28
-22
-16
-11
-5
1
7
13
10
-53
-47
-41
-35
-28
-22
-16
-10
-4
3
9
15
-58
-51
-45
-39
-32
-26
-19
-13
-7
0
6
20
-61
-55
-48
-42
-35
-29
-22
-15
-9
-2
4
25
-64
-58
-51
-44
-37
-31
-24
-17
-11
-4
3
30
-67
-60
-53
-46
-39
-33
-26
-19
-12
-5
1
35
-69
-62
-55
-48
-41
-34
-27
-21
-14
-7
0
40
-71
-64
-57
-50
-43
-36
-29
-22
-15
-8
-1
Estimate the partial derivatives ,, and . Use these results to estimate the second-order partial .
In a similar way, estimate the second-order partial .
Estimate the partial derivatives ,, and , and use your results to estimate the partial .
In a similar way, estimate the partial derivative .
Write several sentences that explain what the values ,, and indicate regarding the behavior of .
As we have found in Activities 2.2.2 and Activity 2.2.3, we may think of as measuring the “twist” of the graph as we increase along a particular trace where is held constant. In the same way, measures how the graph twists as we increase . If we remember that Clairaut’s theorem tells us that , we see that the amount of twisting is the same in both directions. This twisting is perhaps more easily seen in Figure 2.2.9, which shows the graph of , for which .
There are four second-order partial derivatives of a function of two independent variables and :
and
The unmixed second-order partial derivatives, and , tell us about the concavity of the traces. The mixed second-order partial derivatives, and , tell us how the graph of twists.
The Heat Index, , (measured in apparent degrees F) is a function of the actual temperature outside (in degrees F) and the relative humidity (measured as a percentage). A portion of the table which gives values for this function, , is reproduced in Table 2.2.12.
Table2.2.12.Heat index.
TH
70
75
80
85
90
106
109
112
115
92
112
115
119
123
94
118
122
127
132
96
125
130
135
141
State the limit definition of the value . Then, estimate , and write one complete sentence that carefully explains the meaning of this value, including units.
State the limit definition of the value . Then, estimate , and write one complete sentence that carefully explains the meaning of this value, including units.
Finally, do likewise to estimate , and write a sentence to explain the meaning of the value you found.
Assume that temperature is measured in degrees Celsius and that and are each measured in inches.
Determine and . Do not do any additional work to algebraically simplify your results.
Calculate . Suppose that an ant is walking past the point along the line . Write a sentence to explain the meaning of the value of , including units.
Calculate . Suppose instead that an ant is walking past the point along the line . Write a sentence to explain the meaning of the value of , including units.
Determine and hence compute . What is the meaning of this value? Explain, in terms of an ant walking on the heated metal plate.
Evaluate each of the partial derivatives in (a) at the point .
What do the values in (b) suggest about the behavior of near ? Plot a graph of and compare what you see visually to what the values suggest.
Determine ,,,,, and .
Evaluate each of the partial derivatives in (d) at the point .
What do the values in (e) suggest about the behavior of near ? Plot a graph of and compare what you see visually to what the values suggest.
What do the functions and have in common at ? What is different? What do your observations tell you regarding the importance of a certain second-order partial derivative?