Kevin Gonzales, Eric Hopkins, Catherine Zimmitti, Cheryl Kane, Modified to fit Applied Calculus from Coordinated Calculus by Nathan Wakefield et. al., Based upon Active Calculus by Matthew Boelkins
Limits are a mathematical construct we can use to describe the behavior of a function near a point. Why might we want to consider the behavior near a point instead of at the point? Consider the function . The domain of is , that is the domain is all not equal to . Thus we can say that does not exists (DNE). Since we can not plug in , we will instead seek to understand what happens to as gets closer and closer, but not equal to, . We can try to answer this question by simply plugging in values of that are getting closer and closer to into , see Table 1.1.1.
Instead of filling out a table of values, we could instead look at the graph of a function and ask the same question. What happens to the function as gets closer and closer, but not equal to, a particular value? Consider the function given by the graph in Figure 1.1.2 below. We can evaluate the function at a variety of points. For example, ,, and .
A careful look at the graph above shows that has a hole (or a removable discontinuity) at , making even though the overall shape of the graph might lead us to expect to be . In fact, you would probably agree that “as gets closer and closer (but NOT equal) to , gets as close as we want to .”
Both of these examples demonstrate the idea of a limit; that is, both ask the question: what happens to the function as gets closer and closer, but not equal to, a particular value?
Limits give us a way to identify a trend in the values of a function as its input variable approaches a particular value of interest. We need a precise understanding of what it means to say “a function has limit as approaches .”
In Figure 1.1.2, we saw that as gets closer and closer (but NOT equal) to 0, gets as close as we want to the value 4. At first, this may feel counter-intuitive, because the value of is , not . Limits describe the behavior of a function arbitrarily close to a fixed input and are not affected by the value of the function at the fixed input. More formally, 1
What follows here is not what mathematicians consider the formal definition of a limit. To be completely precise, it is necessary to quantify both what it means to say “as close to as we like” and “sufficiently close to .” That can be accomplished through what is traditionally called the epsilon-delta definition of limits. That being said, the definition presented here is sufficient for the purposes of this text.
If a function is defined on an interval around , except perhaps at the point , we define the limit of the function as approaches to be a number (if one exists) such that is as close to as we want whenever is sufficiently close to (but ). If exists, we write
For any function , there are typically three ways to answer the question “does have a limit at , and if so, what is the limit?”
Create a table to look at values that approach on either side (typically using some sort of computing technology), and ask if they seem to approach a single value, as we did in the first example in the introduction.
Look at the graph of the function and see what value the function is approaching as approaches on either side.
Use the algebraic form of the function to understand the trend in its output values as the input values approach .
The first approach can be tedious and should only be used for functions that you can not use the second two approaches. If you can write a computer program to do this then it can be a very useful approach.
Example1.1.3.
Recall the function from the section introduction, whose graph is reproduced below.
Figure1.1.4.Graph of
For the function pictured in Figure 1.1.4, we make the following observations:
and.
When finding a limit from a graph, it suffices to ask if the function approaches a single value from each side of the fixed input. The function value at the fixed input is irrelevant. This reasoning explains the values of the three limits stated above.
We further observe that does not have a limit as approaches because there is a jump in the graph at . If we approach from the left, the function values tend to get close to 3, but if we approach from the right, the function values get close to 2. There is no single number that all of these function values approach. This is why the limit of does not exist at .
Example1.1.5.
Consider the function graphed below.
Figure1.1.6.Graph of
For the function pictured in Figure 1.1.6, we make the following observations:
and.
When finding a limit from a graph, it suffices to ask if the function approaches a single value from each side of the fixed input. The function value at the fixed input is irrelevant. Thus, the limit to is even though (where the filled in dot is), and the limit to is even though . This reasoning explains the values of the four limits stated above.
We further observe that does not have a limit as approaches because there is a jump in the graph at . If we approach from the left, the function values tend to get close to , but if we approach from the right, the function values get close to 0. There is no single number that all of these function values approach. This is why the limit of does not exist at .
For a function defined on an interval around a number ,
means that the value of gets as close as we want to a number whenever is sufficiently close to , assuming the value exists.
We define a limit from the left and a limit from the right in the same way as above, while adding the stipulation that for the left limit and for the right limit. That is, as we move sufficiently close to from the left on a number line (), gets as close to the limit value as we want. Similarly for the limit from the right.
A function has limit as if and only if has a left-hand limit at , has a right-hand limit at , and the left- and right-hand limits are equal. Visually, this means that there can be a hole in the graph at , but the function must approach the same single value from either side of .